I’m
tempted to extrapolate, the polite way of saying I want to make stuff up. I
can’t help it.
I want
to give him a story, a history and a life full of odd coincidences and trivial
choices that turned out to be momentous when viewed through the lens of
hindsight. I at least want to make him 33 years old, and therefore a
contemporary of a Springfield, Illinois man who was just starting a career in
law.
But I
can’t. I have scruples. Also a limited imagination.
So he
was just a guy, a Parisian, who wanted to get his shoes shined, his boots
blacked. He stopped and sat down one day in 1838, on the Boulevard du Temple, a
popular and busy street, and got all shined up.
I can
at least imagine that he never knew that Louis Daguerre had a good view from
the window of his office, high up and blocks away. Experimenting with primitive
photography (the first permanent photo had been taken only a dozen years
before), Daguerre needed a long exposure time, 5-10 minutes, long enough to
blur into nothingness any other human figures, including the bootblack.
But
this guy needed his shoes shined, so he sat still long enough to be preserved
on a plate. And then, I suppose, wandered off to do something else, never
knowing his walk-on role in history, unbilled and anonymous. This was the first
photograph of a human being.
Twenty
years later, our lawyer friend in Illinois would develop sort of his own
fascination with photography, or at least the historical nature of it. Abraham
Lincoln was a homely man and he knew it, and we know it because he posed for
portraits often and continuously until, in fact, just before his assassination
in 1865. By then, of course, photography was becoming a pretty big deal, as was
Lincoln. I have no information about the state of his shoes.
This
intrigues me for reasons I can’t quite explain, not the history as much as the
untold stories, the uncredited cameos that get captured in a trick of light and
shadow. The war ends, a sailor spontaneously kisses a stranger, it stands for
something but the story stays quiet. The sailor had a name, a life, a past and
a future, and that’s what I think about.
I had
another brush with history and bit players recently, thanks to a friend
pointing me in the direction of an online video. In the late winter of 1906,
less than 20 years after its prototype was first constructed, someone stuck a
movie camera on a San Francisco cable car and preserved several minutes of life
at the turn of the century. I’ve watched it several times now and my jaw still drops
from the strange and the familiar, all wrapped up in black and white.
People
walk back and forth in front of the moving car at crazy angles and apparently
nonchalantly. Horse-drawn wagons and early autos jut back and forth almost
whimsically, as if their drivers had never heard of straight lines. There are
some women but mostly men, walking, waiting, standing and talking, everybody
wearing hats and apparently socializing perfectly fine without cell phones.
A lot
of research went into this little piece of film, apparently. It was placed in
time by meticulous tracking of shadows and study of license plates. It can be
set with some certainty in mid-March of that year.
And we
know that the film was sent off to New York to be developed, something to be
grateful for, considering that a few weeks later San Francisco would be
virtually destroyed by the great earthquake and subsequent fires of 1906.
There
are ghosts in this short film, stories we don’t know and lives that have been
finished for a long time. It’s possible that some are still around, the
newsboys (my favorites) hauling around papers half their size, but survivors of
the earthquake have been fairly well documented and the stragglers of over a
century are probably all women.
This
has nothing to do with me, or anything that crosses my path in 2010. Nothing to
do with healthcare reform or climate change or spring training.
It
just struck me that this film was taken 52 years before I was born, and now
it’s been 52 years since then. As a boy I knew people who remembered 1906 well,
and there were plenty of them. What seems ancient and grainy, unfamiliar and
even alien was once fresh and new, filled with simple stories of life and
adventure and jobs and family, and I just wish I knew more of those stories.
I can
still appreciate my ability to watch, though, from the comfort of my home and
at the push of a key, and so I click “replay” and watch again.